Tuesday Debut – Presenting Beth Anderson!

Welcome, Everyone!

It’s the friendly, Tuesday writer’s club coffee hour here on Blueberry Hill!

Take off your shoes, tuck yourself into a comfy chair, wrap your hands around a nice hot mug of coffee or tea, and let’s settle in for a cozy chat with today’s Tuesday Debut-ess!

(What do you think?  Is debut-ess an improvement on debutee or is debutee better?  I’m still trying to think up a good word 🙂 )

While you’re thinking on that, coffee cake anyone?

apple cake

Photo and recipe from ScrummyLane


Before we get started, I want to take this opportunity to invite you all to evaluate the information you’re getting from these Tuesday Debut posts.  As you read, please think about whether you’re getting all the information you hoped for from the weekly posts.  Do you have burning questions we’re not addressing?  Specific things you’re dying to know about the publication process? If there are questions you’d like to see included in future Tuesday Debuts, please share them with me in the comments or email me!  It is easy to make changes and I definitely want to make improvements if there are any you can see to be made.  I want this series to be as helpful to everyone as possible!

Now, it is my extreme pleasure to introduce today’s Tuesday Debut author, the lovely and talented Beth Anderson and her wonderful book:

by Beth Anderson
illustrated by Elizabeth Baddeley
Paula Wiseman Books/Simon & Schuster, 9/25/18
Narrative Nonfiction, age 4-8


Brand new Educator’s Guide available HERE

Do you ever wish English was eez-ee-yer to spell? Ben Franklin and Noah Webster did!


SUSANNA: Thank you so much for joining us today, Beth!  We are all so glad of the opportunity to learn from your experience!  I’m chuckling because entirely by coincidence, the book I posted for PPBF a few days ago was Noah Webster And His Words by Jeri Chase Ferris – a nice companion to your book!  Where did the idea for this book come from?

BETH: Ben Franklin had me at “ish.” When I saw a news blurb item about how he wanted to change the English alphabet, including six new letters (one of which was “ish”), I was immediately interested. As a linguistics major, reading specialist, and English teacher, how could I resist? When I read further, his quote, “Those people spell best who do not know how to spell,” hit me. The kids! They’re sounding words out. So sensible. Just what Franklin wanted. His quirky humor went straight to my heart. From there, I had to dig in and find the story. (For more on the inspiration, see this post. )


SUSANNA: How long did it take you to write this book?

BETH: After the initial exploration confirms that a topic has potential, I research for a few weeks, organize ideas, then start drafting. AN INCONVENIENT ALPHABET took about six months to reach “ready” for an editor critique. (I was working on a couple other manuscripts in various stages at the time, as well.) After the critique, I revised for another month and a half. It involved more research, some “reframing,” and tightening.


SUSANNA: Did you go through many revisions?

BETH: My revision process has changed as I’ve learned more and more about how to shape a story. AN INCONVENIENT ALPHABET went through about 40 revisions. An earlier manuscript, which will be my second picture book, had 91 revisions. Part of the difference is the story itself. But much of what accounts for far fewer revisions with “Alpha” is that I did a lot more organizing of information and brainstorming of possible structures and “vital idea” before I wrote. Also, I made many more changes with each revision as I’m not only fine tuning sentences, but looking at structure, conflict, characterization, etc. I think the key to making revisions that matter is to go beyond the sentence level where you keep reworking the same “story,” and, instead, push yourself to experiment with structure and holistic level changes. Finding just the right thread to make a story marketable and being able to reframe it that way is an ongoing challenge!

(There’s more on revising this manuscript HERE. )


SUSANNA: When did you know your manuscript was ready for submission?

BETH: Probably like most of us, I often think a manuscript is ready before it really is. We write the story we love and revise it until it’s just right, but often fail to see the big picture, or the marketing picture, or the irresistible premise picture—all things editors see. That’s why critique groups are so important. (Not your kids, or spouse, or neighbor.) That’s also (just one reason) why an agent is so valuable. A good agent has “editor eyes.” All these people help us see a story in different ways and can tug on the reins when we want to go ahead and submit before its ready.

With this manuscript, after I had taken it through many revisions, various critique groups over and over, and past my agent several times, I purchased an editor critique. With that, I took each piece of feedback and made sure I had applied it to the entire story. Then, when feedback came back with tiny tweaks, and the story itself got a genuine “yes!” it told me that the manuscript was ready to sub.




SUSANNA: When and how did you submit?

BETH: At a writing retreat, I purchased editor critiques on several manuscripts. My agent, the wonderful Stephanie Fretwell-Hill, advised which manuscripts fit which editors. After the retreat, I worked with Sylvie Frank’s feedback to revise AN INCONVENIENT ALPHABET, and then we sent it to her on a 30-day exclusive submission. Ta-da! She loved it. (Note: Sylvie said that acquiring a manuscript in that way is rare for her.)

That all sounds so easy, right? Well, there was a lengthy process leading up to that. If you’re interested in how I got to that point, HERE’s more.


SUSANNA: When did you get “the call”?  How did you celebrate signing your contract?  (If you care to share 🙂 )

BETH: To be honest, the thrill of both the news of the offer and the signing of the contract were tempered by sad events. The contrast of emotions served to remind me of what’s truly important and that life is a balance. My joy settled inside, nestled with gratitude, encouragement, and anticipation of the new adventure.

SUSANNA:  I’m so sorry that what should have been a joyous occasion was tempered by sadness, Beth.  But you are right.  It does help us keep perspective.


SUSANNA: Was the contract what you expected in terms of advance, royalty percentage, publication timeline, author copies etc.?


BETH: Mostly, I didn’t know what to expect! This too is a learning process. I asked some questions of my agent to better understand it all and am so glad that I had her to lead me through it and do the negotiations.


SUSANNA: Tell us about the editorial process and your experience with the illustration process…

BETH: There were few revisions to make for the editor since I had already revised per her feedback. She got an illustrator on board very quickly – the amazing Elizabeth Baddeley! About 3-4 months after the contract was signed we had sketches. That’s an exciting moment! Copy edits came soon after. I made a few tweaks to the text here and there. I was kept in the loop throughout, and the process was smooth and comfortable. The editor’s vision never conflicted with mine, but rather enhanced everything that I had envisioned.

As a rookie, I was wishing I had more knowledge of the editorial process, what to expect when, etc. Here’s how I would explain the process:

Imagine the editor drives up to your house in a limo and invites you to go for a ride. You sit up front and chat along the way. You know the destination, but don’t know the route. So you spend much time looking out the window, wondering, asking a question now and then. Along the way, you pick up other people – the illustrator, art director, etc. But…there’s that limo barrier between the front and back. You can’t talk to the people back there, but the editor can, and once in a while relays a bit of what’s going on. You ooh and ahh at landmarks along the way, feel a festive spirit permeate the vehicle, and, finally, after a long trip, you arrive at the book!

As I work on more manuscripts, I see that each one is a bit different. So…basically, sit back and enjoy the ride!



SUSANNA: Did you get to see advance reviews from Kirkus, SLJ, etc? What was that like?

BETH: Seeing the advance reviews from Kirkus and SLJ was a joyful moment – a bit of relief combined with anticipation at getting the book in the hands of kids.


SUSANNA: How long did it take from offer to having the first copy in your hand?

BETH: 2 years


SUSANNA: Describe any marketing/promotion you did for this book.

BETH: I’m really only beginning this aspect of the book and learning as I go. I have lots of lists!! Here’s what I’ve done so far:

  • scheduled a release party at a local Barnes and Noble,
  • requested F&Gs be sent to a number of bloggers in hopes that they will want to review AN INCONVENIENT ALPHABET and have been lucky enough to receive invitations for interviews from friends within the kidlit world.
  • postcards, bookmarks, additional business cards
  • contacted bookstores in the area about opportunities such as local author signing days and festivals, as well as school visits they coordinate. (I don’t think this book is the best for story times with toddlers.)
  • planned activities for events
  • completed authors pages on Amazon, Goodreads, etc., SCBWI opportunities
  • added pages to my website
  • blog posts for my own site on my writer’s journey and process
  • created Pinterest boards related to the book
  • working on a presentation for schools and paperwork associated with that


SUSANNA: What is your publisher doing to market and promote your book?

BETH: I’ve been assigned a publicist and am copying her on any plans I make so she can coordinate books being available. She will arrange signings I request when I travel and send F&Gs to people I’ve requested. I’ll work with her on any conferences, but at this point have none scheduled. The publisher has sent copies to reviewers and created an educator’s guide.


SUSANNA: How long was it between the time you started writing seriously and the time you sold your first picture book?

BETH: I made the decision to jump into writing for children in the fall of 2013. In the beginning of 2016, I signed with an agent, and in September 2016, I had my first offer.


SUSANNA: Anything else you’d like to share about your book’s journey from inspiration to publication?

BETH: I think each book has lessons to teach us as writers. As I got to know the characters in AN INCONVENIENT ALPHABET, Ben Franklin’s philosophy of letting your ideas “take their chance in the world” really struck a chord with me. In contrast, Noah Webster wanted to force his ideas on people. One approach is stressful, the other not. One approach considers you know best, the other accepts that maybe you don’t. One approach lets rejections quash the spirit, the other takes them in stride.

So, do your best, and put those manuscripts out there. Let your ideas “take their chance in the world!” 🙂


photo credit Tina Wood

Beth Anderson, a former English as a Second Language teacher, has always marveled at the power of books. Armed with linguistics and reading degrees, a fascination with language, and penchant for untold tales, she strives for accidental learning in the midst of a great story. Beth lives in Colorado where she laughs, wonders, thinks, and questions; and hopes to inspire kids to do the same.

website and social media links





An Educator’s Guide is available HERE.

Beth, thank you again so much for being with us today, and readers, thank you for stopping by to read.  If you have questions for Beth I’m sure she will do her best to answer if she has time.

I think it’s interesting that the interviews from both Jessie last week and Beth this week showed how much writing is but one piece in the puzzle of life.  It’s so easy as an unpublished writer (or even a published writer hoping for another sale) to think that if you can get published, everything will be perfect!  There is no denying that getting published is wonderful!  It is the dream.  It is what we all work so hard for.  But for Jessie it came with a new baby, and for Beth it came with sadness in her life.  Both things put publication in perspective.  Jessie’s book was drawn from her life experience of having a grandfather with Alzheimers, and Beth was able to write her book because of her background as a teacher and her knowledge of and interest in linguistics.  So if you’re looking for inspiration, you may, like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz, have no need to look any further than your own back yard. You may find it right there in your life.

Whether you’re published yet or not, write for the joy of writing and enjoy the process and the journey.  It’s hard work, but we do it because we love it, and I think most of us would agree that there aren’t many occupations that can rival making up stories, or sharing the wonders of the nonfiction world with kids 🙂

Happy Tuesday! 🙂 and don’t forget to let me know if there are questions you want answered in future posts!

Missed any Tuesday Debuts?  Check them out!

Christy Mihaly – Hey! Hey! Hay! A Tale of Bales And The Machines That Make Them

Jessie Oliveros – The Remember Balloons

75 thoughts on “Tuesday Debut – Presenting Beth Anderson!

  1. Kathy Halsey says:

    I’ve read several of Beth’s interviews now and I am learning lots re: what happens after the book is in the pipeline. Gonna dive back into some revising of my own, so Beth, I appreciate the links here to go further with that piece.
    Susanna, I appreciate your advice to temper the feeling that “all I need is a published book and my life will be better.” It’d al a part of our bigger life and our life gives richness to our writing. Now back to coffee! Loving this series!

    • Susanna Leonard Hill says:

      I don’t think it matters how long you’ve been doing this, Kathy. There are ALWAYS new things to learn from others. I am grateful to the writers who are participating in this series for sharing their experience because we all gain from it! And yes, we have to live before we can write :). Enjoy your coffee and reading, and have a fabulous writing day! 🙂

  2. ptnozell says:

    Congratulations, Beth! So helpful to learn about your book’s journey. Although I know each journey varies, the analogy of the limo ride is so illustrative of the publication process & your nod to Dorothy & home, Susanna, is an important reminder. Thank you both!

  3. Marla says:

    I love the idea of having more letters but they look so much like already existing letters! I’m glad the idea didn’t stick but it will definitely be fun to read about!

  4. jeanjames926 says:

    What a fabulous interview. Congratulations Beth on this book, I just love how “ish” was your inspiration. I look forward to reading your book. Susanna I just love this series, and think TD is very informative. Not that I have anyone looking to publish my book ideas…yet…but if I did I would want to know what the normal financial contract would like. I’m sure that process must be so confusing for a new author. Thanks!

    • Susanna Leonard Hill says:

      I totally get that, Jean. That’s one of the things I’m curious about too, even now. I know what the normal percentages are for authors, but I think they may be different for author/illustrators and illustrators, and I know advances differ for each of those categories as well as from house to house. I may add a question about this to the interview and let authors answer if they wish to share. Thanks for the suggestion!

  5. Katie Engen says:

    I love this topic #wordnerd. How nice (and I’m sure rather deliberate) that all your background fed this project so well.

    Susanna – I’m always curious about how an author may use art or illustrator notes in submissions. I know the proper standard is to use none or barely any (and let the illustrator go to town). I’m not arguing this point. Yet for those who do use them, I would like examples of art/illustrator notes that were included and how well they were received.

    • Beth Anderson says:

      I’m learning that there are an incredible number of wordnerds out there! On your Illustration Notes question – I can offer that this manuscript had notes for the public speech bubbles, except for one page where the bubbles were added to provide better understanding for the text. What I’ve been told is to only use notes when necessary for comprehension of the text. Notes may also be needed for historical info vital to the story. One thing I’ve started to try to do is to move the “necessary” info from the note into the text if I can. Sometimes one or two words that provide a hint or reference point will do the job.

    • Susanna Leonard Hill says:

      That is a very good question, Katie, and one I’m sure a lot of folks would be interested in knowing. People ask me about it all the time. As Beth says below, we all try to keep art notes to a minimum and use them only to provide comprehension, so some authors might not have included any. But that would be interesting to know, and if they did include any it would be interesting to see a sample! Thanks for the suggestion!

  6. Melissa Berger Stoller says:

    Great post Beth and Susanna! I love this book and enjoyed hearing more about Beth’s inspiration, process, and marketing ideas. And I admire Ben Franklin’s philosophy of “letting your ideas take their chance in the world.” Congratulations, Beth!

  7. matthewlasley says:

    Great interview Susanna!

    It always gives heart and hope to see the success of others. Wow! 91 revisions on a picture book. That is dedication, but also a reminder that when you think your book is ready, it is only the first step.

    • Susanna Leonard Hill says:

      Glad you enjoyed it, Matthew! And yes, we all usually need to revise more than we think we do :). But then, you hear the stories of people who were seized by inspiration and sat down and wrote a picture book in 20 minutes that went on to set the world on fire! :). That is what we all dream of, but the reality is a lot of butt in chair! 🙂

  8. marty says:

    Thanks to you both, Beth and Susanna. Learning so much from these posts.
    Beth, the book sounds fascinating. Look forward to reading it.
    And Susanna, you’ve covered everything thoroughly. Can’t think of further questions so far.

    • Susanna Leonard Hill says:

      I’m glad you found information that was so helpful you want to save it, Laura! F&G is “folded and gathered” – kind of like the color printed insides of the book, held together by staples, or sometimes nothing, not bound yet. Sometimes it includes a dust jacket, sometimes not. But it’s basically like a preview of the book. If I can remember, I’ll take a couple pictures of one of mine and show you! But I don’t have time right this second, so if I forget, nudge me!

    • Beth Anderson says:

      Yes – F&G is basically an unbound copy of the book that is not final. I had to ask my editor about F&G vs ARC. Basically they’re the same – review copies. F&Gs usually for picture books and ARCs usually for novels or I guess anything with more pages. Yay for you upcoming debut! Congratulations!

  9. Rebecca Gomez says:

    This book looks awesome. Can’t wait to read it! Also, I’m still reeling about those 91 revisions she mentioned for her other book! That’s dedication right there.

    • Beth Anderson says:

      Ha! I tried different structures within those 91, but that was also an earlier manuscript in which I did less with each revision. (I was getting rejections and trying to revise to address any feedback, too.) Now I revise many more aspects in one revision so there are fewer. But it’s also because I’ve learned with each one how to better revise and I start off with more in mind due to better organizing and preparation.

  10. Patricia Finnegan says:

    Thank you for sharing, Beth! and to Susanna: Three cheers (and more) for another very informative interview.

    As others have already said, I was struck by the 91 revisions, AND I am going to try to put into action the following comment by Beth: “I think the key to making revisions that matter is to go beyond the sentence level where you keep reworking the same “story,” and, instead, push yourself to experiment with structure and holistic level changes.”

  11. Virginia Rinkel says:

    Oh, it takes me so long to get to these comments pages. After some health issues this past February, I am now feeling a bit back to myself, and still need to relook at all of these wonderful lessons, ( Ilve printed them off and have them in a notebook so I can read it anytime of the day/night and I also need to explore more of Melissa Stewarts blogs on NF PB too. I also need a critique group. Thank you for all you do, and I’m still working on getting a better angle on this chestnut book of mine.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s